.png)
Who Is Responsible for Roofing Decisions in Public & Commercial Buildings?
- Feb 6
- 3 min read
In public and commercial buildings, roofing decisions are rarely straightforward. Responsibility is often shared across owners, landlords, managing agents, asset managers and consultants - yet accountability ultimately sits with specific duty holders.
Understanding who is responsible, and at what stage, is essential. Not just for budget control, but for legal compliance, safety, and long-term asset protection.
This guide explains how responsibility for roofing decisions is typically structured in the UK, where accountability lies, and why problems often arise when roles are unclear.
Why Roofing Responsibility Is Often Misunderstood
Roofing decisions are frequently delayed or disputed because responsibility is assumed rather than defined.
Common issues include:
Surveys identifying issues without clear instruction to act
Reports passed between departments without ownership
Budget holders separated from technical decision-makers
Reactive repairs approved without long-term strategy
In public and commercial environments, this lack of clarity can lead to escalating defects, repeated leaks and avoidable cost.
Ultimate Responsibility: Owners, Landlords & Duty Holders
In most cases, legal responsibility for roofing decisions rests with the building owner or landlord, even when day-to-day management is delegated.
This responsibility includes:
Ensuring the roof is safe and structurally sound
Maintaining compliance with Building Regulations and health & safety law
Acting on known defects or risks
Retaining appropriate records and documentation
This includes wider roofing safety and compliance responsibilities, particularly where buildings are occupied, publicly accessible or subject to regulatory oversight.
In higher-risk or public buildings, recent legislation has reinforced the need for clear accountability and traceable decision-making throughout a building’s lifecycle.
Delegating tasks does not remove responsibility - it only shifts who carries them out.
The Role of Managing Agents & Asset Managers
Managing agents and asset managers typically act on behalf of the owner or landlord. Their role is operational rather than legal, but their influence on outcomes is significant.
Responsibilities often include:
Commissioning roof surveys and inspections
Managing maintenance programmes
Prioritising works based on risk and budget
Coordinating contractors and consultants
Problems arise when:
Reports are received but not acted upon
Decisions are deferred awaiting budget approval
Short-term fixes replace long-term planning
In residential and mixed-use buildings, Section 20 consultation requirements can further delay action, even when technical risk has already been identified.
Consultants, Surveyors & Technical Advisors
Surveyors and consultants provide professional advice, not decisions.
Their role is to:
Assess condition
Identify defects
Recommend options
Outline risk and urgency
They do not:
Approve budgets
Authorise works
Accept responsibility for inaction
A common misconception is that commissioning a survey transfers responsibility. It does not. Responsibility remains with the duty holder to act on the information provided. Understanding what happens after a roof survey is critical, as this is where responsibility shifts from identification to approval, funding and programme planning.
Contractors: Advice vs Authority
Roofing contractors are responsible for:
Carrying out works safely and competently
Following specifications and regulations
Raising concerns where work is unsafe or unsuitable
They are not responsible for:
Strategic decisions made before instruction
Budgets that restrict appropriate solutions
Delays caused by internal approval processes
When contractors decline work or recommend further investigation, it is often due to unresolved responsibility or unacceptable risk - not reluctance to proceed.
Where Responsibility Breakdowns Commonly Occur
In our experience, roofing problems escalate when:
No single person owns the decision
Reports are treated as “information only”
Budget cycles override technical urgency
Temporary repairs become permanent
Monitoring replaces action
This lack of ownership is one of the main reasons roofing reports sit unactioned, even when defects, risks and liabilities are clearly documented. These situations are especially common in housing portfolios, schools and multi-occupied buildings where competing priorities exist.
Why Clear Responsibility Matters
Clear responsibility leads to:
Faster, more confident decisions
Reduced long-term costs
Fewer emergency repairs
Improved compliance
Better contractor engagement
It also protects individuals and organisations by ensuring decisions are traceable, defensible and proportionate to risk.
A Practical Approach to Roofing Decision-Making
Effective organisations typically:
Assign a named decision owner
Link surveys to action plans
Define thresholds for repair vs replacement
Align budgets with asset condition
Review risks regularly, not reactively
This approach turns roofing from a recurring problem into a managed asset.
How We Support Responsible Roofing Decisions
Premier Roofing & Construction Limited works with councils, housing providers and commercial clients to support informed, defensible roofing decisions.
Our role often includes:
Detailed roof surveys and investigations
Clear reporting with prioritised options
Support for repair, refurbishment or replacement planning
Advice aligned with compliance and budget reality
We focus on clarity - not pressure - so decisions can be made confidently and at the right time.
Final Thought
Roofing decisions are rarely about the roof alone. They sit at the intersection of safety, compliance, budget and long-term risk.
Understanding who is responsible - and acting accordingly - is the difference between managed maintenance and recurring failure.
If you’re unsure where responsibility currently sits within your organisation, that uncertainty is often the first sign that a clearer approach is needed.
